Hydrogen Ground State
Atomic hydrogen is found in a few different varieties. The most abundant isotope is called protium. It is formed by the union of a proton with an electron bound together by a force-carrying collection of field quanta that are noted by An atom of hydrogen is noted by so we write
The electron is modeled from this selection
Other excited forms of hydrogen are defined by different fields that involve more quarks. But this ground-state is tiny, it has just 6 quarks per octant.
Protium does not contain any neutrons. But there are two naturally occurring isotopes called deuterium which has one neutron, and tritium which includes two neutrons. These isotopes are discussed later. The rest of this article is devoted to protium, the most common isotope, and from here on, we just refer to it as hydrogen. Thus atoms of ground-state hydrogen are objectified from space-time events as shown in the accompanying table and movie.
|Ground State Hydrogen|
Stereochemical quarks are about a million times smaller than thermodynamic quarks, so they are not shown in the movie. Note that the foregoing model uses only levo quarks as stereochemical components. So we call this case levorotatory hydrogen. If all of the levo quarks are replaced by dextro quarks then the model is of dextrorotatory hydrogen.
The energy difference between dextrorotatory and levorotatory hydrogen is small enough to usually be ignored. But the distinction is important when we use hydrogen to define the handedness of a coordinate system. For the rest of this article we only discuss the levorotatory case, and simply call it hydrogen.
Excited States of Hydrogen
The excited states of atomic hydrogen are built-up from the components shown in the following table. Some rotating quarks are grouped together as spin-up or spin-down field quanta. And a magnetic field is specified using a few muonic quarks.
The set of quarks noted by is called a Lamb quantum. This particle is like a little bit of orbital angular momentum because absorbing or emitting it changes the azimuthal quantum number by without altering or . The Lamb quantum is used to explain the Lamb shift because, as shown below, excited states can be accurately constructed as
Quark coefficients for the Lyman photons are obtained from the gross structure of the hydrogen spectrum, they bring wet and dry quarks into the description. Quarks are conserved so the following models for excited states are obtained by adding together the quark-coefficients of all components. This method automatically conserves charge, momentum, etc.
Quark models of excited states are presented in formulae as combinations of protons, electrons, photons and field quanta. They are also shown explicitly in lists of quark coefficients. Specific excited states are identified using standard atomic spectroscopic notation . Here are some models for the -states. They all have an azimuthal quantum number of .
Here are some models for the excited -states of hydrogen. They have an azimuthal quantum number of .
Here are models for the -states. They are characterized by an azimuthal quantum number of . Not all these states have been directly measured. But we make models of them anyway because they are used later in calculations about fine structure in the hydrogen spectrum.
And finally, here are models for the -states of excited hydrogen which all have an azimuthal quantum number of .
Let note the mechanical energy of some excited state , on a scale where the null-value of is obtained when the electron is very far away from the proton. For this case1Hydrogen Atom – Chemistry WebBook NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, USA. the ground-state has a value of (eV). There are some challenges to making accurate measurements in this context. So we also specify another quantity as the energy on a scale where, by definition, the ground-state always has a value of exactly zero
Then the excited states of hydrogen are described by the sum
The terms in this expression depend strongly on the principal quantum number But there is also a weaker dependence on and These atomic quantum numbers are defined from quark coefficients. So the energy of an atomic state is a function of its quark content, and can be formulated as follows. The fine structure of the hydrogen spectrum is given by
These expressions were developed by Arnold Sommerfeld and Paul Dirac . The number is named the fine structure constant . And is another number called the Rydberg constant . Recall that was introduced earlier to analyze the gross spectrum of hydrogen. The hyperfine energy term is given by
where is the helicity of the excited state, and is the hydrogen hyperfine transition frequency. Describing the hyperfine splitting is simple for EthnoPhysics because we explicitly retain accounts of both up-quarks and down-quarks in our atomic models. The transition frequency has an observed2Helmut Hellwig, Robert F. C. Vessot, Martin W. Levine, Paul W. Zitzewitz, David W. Allan, and David J. Glaze. Measurement of the Unperturbed Hydrogen Hyperfine Transition Frequency IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Volume IM-19, Number 4, November 1970. value of (Hz).
The assessment of has been strongly influenced by Hans Bethe . This formula is broadly based on his work3Hans A. Bethe and Edwin E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms, Springer-Verlag OHG, Berlin 1957.
The numbers and are treated as adjustable parameters. The value of is approximately equal to
The chiral energy term depends on an atom’s stereochemical quarks. Let note a generic stereochemical quark. Then the total number of stereochemical quarks in an atom is
Recall that notes the spin-angular-momentum quantum number. Then the energy associated with chirality is given4This formula does not distinguish between right or left-handedness because it is not necessary to account for atomic hydrogen. However, we may later employ more elaborate expressions to describe hydrogen molecules and their complicated spectra. by
All the foregoing equations, together with formulae for the atomic quantum numbers, are combined with the quark-models to describe the energy levels of atomic hydrogen. Results are compared with experimental observations5Kramida, A., Ralchenko, Yu., Reader, J., and the NIST ASD Team (2018). NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version. 5.6.1). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. in the table below.
The EthnoPhysics quark-models of hydrogen thus reproduce the quantum-numbers of excited states correctly. And calculated energy levels for all 28 measured states are within experimental uncertainty. So the description of an inert hydrogen atom is okay. But transition energies are not fully in agreement with observation, so this analysis is continued later for some finer details in the hydrogen spectrum.
The stability of a particle is described by its mean life which is a function of its thermodynamic temperature, . And the temperature of a hydrogen atom in its ground state is supposed to be very close to zero. Quark models have been carefully adjusted to obtain this. But, despite much effort, the closest to be had for is (K). We doubt that this number has physical significance. Rather, it shows the limit of our computing techniques. Temperature calculations depend on small differences between large numbers. Some rounding errors are inevitable. And if the temperature is near zero, then these errors can be significant.
The non-zero result for hydrogen suggests that our temperature calculations are questionable if more exact than a few parts in a million. This seems to be near the limit of what we can obtain from our present computing arrangements.6For more detail about any of the foregoing calculations please see the Atoms & Photons spreadsheet. As of January 2019 calculations are being done using; Microsoft Excel for Mac, Version 15.16, running on an iMac Model 16.2 with an Intel Core i5, 3.1 GHz processor and 8 GB of memory.
|1||Hydrogen Atom – Chemistry WebBook NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, USA.|
|2||Helmut Hellwig, Robert F. C. Vessot, Martin W. Levine, Paul W. Zitzewitz, David W. Allan, and David J. Glaze. Measurement of the Unperturbed Hydrogen Hyperfine Transition Frequency IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Volume IM-19, Number 4, November 1970.|
|3||Hans A. Bethe and Edwin E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms, Springer-Verlag OHG, Berlin 1957.|
|4||This formula does not distinguish between right or left-handedness because it is not necessary to account for atomic hydrogen. However, we may later employ more elaborate expressions to describe hydrogen molecules and their complicated spectra.|
|5||Kramida, A., Ralchenko, Yu., Reader, J., and the NIST ASD Team (2018). NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version. 5.6.1). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.|
|6||For more detail about any of the foregoing calculations please see the Atoms & Photons spreadsheet. As of January 2019 calculations are being done using; Microsoft Excel for Mac, Version 15.16, running on an iMac Model 16.2 with an Intel Core i5, 3.1 GHz processor and 8 GB of memory.|