Outline

## Newtonian Particles are Dense

So far, EthnoPhysics has given extensive deliberation to photons and nuclear particles. But next we consider heftier objects on the way to discussing Newtonian mechanics.

Let P be a material particle in a stable balance with its environment. It might be emitting and absorbing lots of photons, but not melting or breaking into pieces. Then P is presumably steady enough so that we can model it using a sequence of excited states. Let these states be described by , their density. And recall that the constant number was introduced earlier to grasp the shape of a particle. Then we say that P is a **Newtonian** **particle** if it is so dense that

This condition implies that Newtonian particles are heavy, as shown below. And later we show how interactions between Newtonian particles obey conservation laws for mass and mechanical energy.

To be more exact, let P be in an excited state characterized by , the norm of its radius vector, and , its rest mass. For Newtonian particles, the energy of the rest-mass is almost the same as the absolute-value of the enthalpy . This is because the definition of mass can be rearranged to give

Then recall that is the work required to assemble the quarks in P, so

Also, the density is defined such that . So substituting for gives

But the Newtonian condition requires that . So the negligible term can be dropped to obtain the approximation Finally, taking a square root gives

### Newtonian Particles are Heavy

Let particle P, with a rest mass , be in an excited state characterized by the norm of its radius vector . The density is defined by . So the Newtonian condition that implies that

From the discussion above about enthalpy, we have Then, eliminating the mass from the last two equations yields

But the work required to assemble the quarks in P is So for Newtonian particles Then squaring both sides shows that P satisfies the definition for being a heavy particle,

## Momentum

Momentum is the modern English word used for translating the phrase “quantity of motion” that Sir Isaac Newton uses on the very first page of his great book, the Principia^{1}Isaac Newton, *Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy*, page 639. Translated by A Motte and F Cajori. University of California Press, 1934.. So to understand motion EthnoPhysics starts by using sensation to define the momentum as follows.

Consider some particle P characterized by its wavevector and the total number of quarks it contains . Report on any changes relative to a frame of reference F which is characterized using the average wavevector of the quarks in F. We define the **momentum** of particle P, in reference frame F, as the ordered set of three numbers

where and are constants. The norm of the momentum is marked without an overline as If we say that P is **stationary** or **at rest** in the F-frame. Alternatively, if then we say that P is **in** **motion**.

Momentum is traditionally understood as a product of the mass with a *velocity*. But the premise of EthnoPhysics frowns on the naive acceptance of spatial concepts. And we require some discussion of ideas like dynamic equilibrium before getting to velocity. But later, after untangling some entwined concepts, we ultimately show how the foregoing sensation-based definition of momentum is equivalent to the traditional understanding.

Sensory Interpretation: The momentum is defined by a difference between the wavevector of P and a scaled-down version of the frame’s wavevector. Recall that the wavevector has previously been interpreted as a mathematical representation of somatic and visual sensation. So momentum is like the audio-visual *contrast* between a particle and its reference frame. This juxtaposition attracts and holds our attention because it is necessary for situational awareness. The EthnoPhysics definition of momentum works by expressing the relevance of reference sensations for understanding human experience. Seeing the Sun, seeing blood and seeing gold are vividly pertinent for almost everyone.

Here is an example of determining the momentum for a graviton Recall that the wavevector is defined from sums of quark coefficients, and quarks are conserved. So the wavevector of a graviton is the sum of the wavevectors of its component photons. But the wavevector of any particle is symmetrically opposed to the wavevector of its matching anti-particle. Thus

Then, in a frame of reference noted by F, the momentum of a graviton is given by

where is the total number of quarks in , including all types. This expression shows that all of the gravitons in a description have their momenta pointed in the same direction, and this direction is determined by the character of the reference frame.

### De Broglie’s Postulate

In a perfectly inertial frame of reference . Then the momentum of P is given by

And recall that for particles in motion, the wavelength is . So taking the norm of the momentum and eliminating the wavenumber obtains Louis de Broglie’s statement about the inverse relationship between momentum and wavelength

Thus de Broglie’s postulate notes a conditional proportionality between and that is just built-in to the definitions for these characteristics.

### Momentum is Conserved

Recall that quarks are conserved. So if some free particals , and interact like and are otherwise isolated, then

Also, as shown earlier, wavevectors are combined as . Then by the foregoing definition, momenta are related as

Thus we say that momentum is conserved when compound quarks are formed or decomposed. Newtonian mechanics is based on this relationship. It is important but not unique. Recall that we also have conservation laws for seeds, quarks, charge, lepton number, baryon number and enthalpy. All of these conservation rules follow from the logical requirements of our descriptive method. EthnoPhysics depends on mathematics. Therefore we are constrained by the law of noncontradiction and the associative properties of addition. So any characteristic defined by simple sums of quark coefficients will necessarily be conserved.

## Mechanical Energy

Consider a particle P that is described by its mass and momentum . And please notice that these numbers have been defined by a methodical description of sensation. The **mechanical energy** of P is defined by

where is a constant. This statement comes from Paul Dirac . As a special case for material particles, we can divide by to get

The square root may be expanded in a binomial series as

And if we can ignore the smaller terms to approximate the mechanical energy with the expression

The requirement that is called a **slow motion** condition. An ethereal particle like a photon cannot move slowly because so the condition cannot be satisfied by any value of the momentum.

Here is an example of determining the energy for a graviton Note that the momentum of a graviton was given above. And the mass of a graviton is zero, so

In a perfectly inertial reference frame where gravitons carry no energy or momentum. If we assume that a frame is perfectly inertial, then we are also presuming that gravity can be ignored. For non-inertial frames, both the momentum and energy of a graviton are directly proportional to the total number of quarks it contains.

### The Lorentz Factor

The mass and momentum may also be be combined to specify yet another quantity

This number is called the **Lorentz factor** after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz . His original work^{2}H. A. Lorentz, *The Theory of Electrons and its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat*, page 225. Published by B. G. Teubner at Leipzig, 1909. expressed differently. But later, after discussing velocity, we will see that the forgoing definition is equivalent.

The Lorentz factor is used to classify particles. For example, when the slow motion condition applies, then . But if , then we say that a particle is **relativistic**. To make a useful approximation for the Lorentz factor we expand the square root into a binomial series

Note that this is a little different from the previous series. But for non-relativistic motion, terms become progressively smaller, and the Lorentz factor is roughly given by just the first two summands. Then we can substitute these terms back into the mechanical energy approximation to obtain

### Energy Measurements

Consider some laboratory experiments to measure and let us review some terms often used to compare these observations with theory. Let the experiment be accomplished by any combination of observation and inference whatsoever provided only that it satisfies the professional standards of experimental physicists.

For example this means that instruments are painstakingly calibrated. And any new measurement techniques are carefully compared with previous methods so that any systematic variations can be evaluated. Ideally experiments are repeated and confirmed by different scientists in other laboratories. So overall; measurement is a communal activity, with ancient roots, that links specific laboratory practice to the reproducible report of some number. The twentieth century has left us with an outstanding legacy of data about nuclear particles that come from measurements like this.

Any measurement of a particle presumably involves some sort of interaction that changes its quark content. The change may be small, maybe even negligible, but nonetheless there is always a logical distinction between an observed value and the theoretical concept of the energy of an isolated particle.

The customary way of assessing this is to make many observations, so consider a series of measurements with results noted by . These observed values are related to , the theoretical concept of mechanical energy, by

where is a typical or representative value called the **experimental average**. The other number describes the variation in observed values, it is called the **experimental uncertainty**. For good measurements is small enough so that and are interchangeable thus reconciling theory and observation. Usually the experimental average is determined from the arithmetic mean of the set of observations

and the experimental uncertainty is represented by their standard deviation

Another important number is the coefficient of variation in the data which is defined by the ratio The inverse of this quantity is known as the signal to noise ratio

(dB)

expressed on a logarithmic scale in units of decibels .

## Dynamic Equilibrium

We characterize Newtonian particles as being in some kind of steady balance with their environment. They are presumably interacting with countless photons, bouncing around a lot, and colliding with other particles. But despite much agitation, there is still a central tendency that might be called *realistic* motion, or perhaps *naturalistic* movement. Particles that depart too far from this balance may be called non-Newtonian, or even unphysical. To be more exact about this we define the kinetic and potential energy.

### Kinetic Energy

Consider a material particle P, described by its mass and momentum . The **kinetic energy** of P is defined as

Since for material particles, is never negative. And in an inertial frame, momentum is proportional to the wavenumber . So is proportional to . Then recall that the wavenumber depends only on the coefficients of dynamic quarks. So the kinetic energy depends strongly on P’s dynamic quark content. Dynamic quarks are objectified from somatic and visual sensations. So the kinetic energy depends strongly on these audio-visual sensations too.

### Potential Energy

Let us also include the mechanical energy in the description of P. The difference between and the kinetic energy defines another number called the **potential energy**

To evaluate , recall that if P is in slow motion, then

So the potential energy is approximated by . Thus for slowly moving Newtonian particles, the potential energy depends strongly on the mass. Then remember that for heavy particles, a sensory interpretation of the mass relates mainly to baryonic quarks and thermal sensations. And so for Newtonian particles, the potential energy is mostly associated with thermal sensations too.

### What is Dynamic Equilibrium?

A particle is in **dynamic equilibrium** when its kinetic and potential energies are equal to each other. At equilibrium and there is an equal sharing, or **equipartition**, of mechanical energy between kinetic and potential types. But the potential energy is defined above by less . So for a particle in dynamic equilibrium

This account of dynamic equilibrium is succinct. And equipartition provides an important theoretical linkage to traditional notions of momentum. But it is not very helpful in the laboratory. Difficulties arise from using a hypothetical condition of perfect isolation to set the zero-value for energy measurements. Recall that our initial discussion of internal energy adopted the reference sensation of *not* seeing the Sun to grasp the notion of having *no* energy. So even in principle, there is no tangible reference standard for absolute-zero on the energy scale. And this is noticeable now that measurements can be made to a few parts in a trillion.

Moreover, there are conflicts with theories of dispersion and gravitation which may deny the possibility of perfect isolation. Anyway, these difficulties are manageable because physical phenomena often occur within distinct energy regimes which have different ‘zeros’. In the laboratory we measure energy changes, that are related to each other by . Then a null-value standard for calibrated energy-difference measurements can be selected for experimental convenience. Results are reported using a slightly different version of the energy with a shifted origin

Then . These energy-differences are more susceptible of precise laboratory observation than absolute values. But and equipartition is inapt for shifted energies.

Sensory interpretation: As noted above, the kinetic energy characterizes visual stimuli, whereas the potential energy depends more on thermal perception. So there must be a balanced experience of both thermal and visual sensation for events to be objectified as particles in dynamic equilibrium. This requirement for eyes-open visual sensation means that, for example, a dream about flying while asleep cannot meet equilibrium conditions. And neither can watching cartoons on TV, because television only transmits audio-visual sensations, not thermal sensations. So dynamic equilibrium is more like experiencing ordinary daily circumstances in our classrooms and laboratories on Earth. Unlike many movies, dreams and hallucinations.

## Energy Conservation

Newtonian particles are dense and heavy. And we regularly assume that they are in dynamic equilibrium with their surroundings. Then as discussed earlier, their enthalpy , is related to their mass , by the approximation

But the mechanical energy of any material particle is approximately where is the Lorentz factor. Then

For particles in slow motion so that . But the absolute-value signs can usually be ignored because ordinary particles are composed from electrons, neutrons and protons which all have positive enthalpy. So if we exclude anti-particles and processes like annihilation, then we usually have

Thus the mechanical energy and the enthalpy are almost interchangeable for slow Newtonian particles made of ordinary matter. But enthalpy is conserved for *all* particles and conditions. So the energy and mass must also be approximately conserved for slow Newtonian particles too. This idea is honoured as an energy conservation *law* because it is so important for classical mechanics. Moreover, a conservation law for mass is a basic principle in benchtop chemistry. These excellent approximations are used everyday. Together with the routine assumption of dynamic equilibrium they typify Newtonian particles.

## Refraction

Consider some particle P characterized by its wavevector and the total number of quarks it contains . Report on any changes relative to a frame of reference F which is characterized using the average wavevector of the quarks in F. The momentum of P in the F-frame is defined as

Let the frame of reference be formed from a large component and a smaller part that **surrounds** P so that

Let the large part of F be responsible for any gravitons that interact with P so that when gravitational effects are completely negligible Then P’s momentum is given by

From de Broglie’s postulate we have so

To simplify, set in the expression above to define as the wavelength of P in a **non-dispersive** surrounding medium

Many different combinations of photons and media are usefully characterized by defining the ratio

This number is called the **index of refraction**. Then in environments where there is no dispersion, and motion is described by

1 | Isaac Newton, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, page 639. Translated by A Motte and F Cajori. University of California Press, 1934. |
---|---|

2 | H. A. Lorentz, The Theory of Electrons and its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat, page 225. Published by B. G. Teubner at Leipzig, 1909. |