Newtonian Particles are Dense
Let P be a material particle in a steady balance with its environment. It might be emitting and absorbing lots of photons, but not melting or exploding. Then P is presumably steady enough so that we can model it as a sequence of excited states. Let these states be described by , their density. And recall that the constant number was introduced earlier to grasp the shape of a particle. Then we say that P is a Newtonian particle if it is so dense that
This condition implies that Newtonian particles are heavy, as shown below. And later we also show how interactions between Newtonian particles obey conservation laws for mass and energy.
To be more exact, let P be in an excited state characterized by , the norm of its radius vector, and , its rest mass. For Newtonian particles, the energy of the rest-mass is almost the same as the absolute-value of the enthalpy . This is because the definition of mass can be rearranged to give
Then recall that is the work required to assemble the quarks in P, so
Also, the density is defined such that . So substituting for gives
But the Newtonian condition requires that . So the negligible term can be dropped to obtain the approximation Finally, taking a square root gives
Newtonian Particles are Heavy
Let particle P, with a rest mass , be in an excited state characterized by the norm of its radius vector . The density is defined by . So the Newtonian condition that implies that
From the discussion above about enthalpy, we have Then, eliminating the mass yields
Momentum is the modern English word used for translating the phrase “quantity of motion” that Sir Isaac Newton uses on the very first page of his great book, the Principia1Isaac Newton, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, page 639. Translated by A Motte and F Cajori. University of California Press, 1934.. So to understand motion EthnoPhysics starts by using sensation to define the momentum as follows.
Consider some particle P characterized by its wavevector and the total number of quarks it contains Report on any changes relative to a frame of reference F which is characterized using the average wavevector of the quarks in F. We define the momentum of particle P, in reference frame F, as the ordered set of three numbers
where and are constants. The norm of the momentum is marked without an overline as If we say that P is stationary or at rest in the F-frame. Alternatively, if then we say that P is moving or in motion.
Momentum is traditionally understood as a product of the mass with a velocity. But the premise of EthnoPhysics questions how we accept spatial ideas like velocity. So instead we start with this sensation-based definition of momentum. Then later, after untangling some entwined concepts, we show how for many particles and conditions.
Sensory Interpretation: The momentum is defined by a difference between the wavevector of P and a scaled-down version of the frame’s wavevector. Recall that the wavevector has previously been interpreted as a mathematical representation of somatic and visual sensation. So momentum is like the audio-visual contrast between a particle and its reference frame. This juxtaposition attracts and holds our attention because it is necessary for situational awareness and survival. The EthnoPhysics definition of momentum works by expressing the relevance of reference sensations. Seeing the Sun, seeing blood and seeing gold are vividly pertinent for understanding motivation, movement and motion.
Momentum is Conserved
Recall that quarks are conserved. So if some particles , and interact like but are otherwise isolated, then the total number of quarks, is constrained as Also, as shown earlier, wavevectors are combined as if these particles are free. Then by substitution into the definition of momentum
Thus we say that momentum is conserved when compound quarks are formed or decomposed. Newtonian mechanics is built on this relationship. It is important but not unique. Recall that we also have conservation laws for seeds, quarks, charge, lepton number, baryon number and enthalpy. All of these conservation rules follow from the logical requirements of our descriptive method. EthnoPhysics depends on mathematics. Therefore we are constrained by the law of noncontradiction and the associative properties of addition. So any characteristic defined by simple sums of quark coefficients will always be conserved.
De Broglie’s Postulate
In a perfectly inertial frame of reference . Then the momentum of P is given by
And recall that for particles in motion, the wavelength is . So taking the norm of the momentum and eliminating the wavenumber obtains Louis de Broglie’s statement about the inverse relationship between momentum and wavelength
Thus de Broglie’s postulate notes a conditional proportionality between and that is just built-in to the EthnoPhysics definitions of these characteristics. Moreover these definitions apply to all sorts of particles, photons as well as Newtonian particles. So De Broglie’s postulate is often used to determine the momentum of a photon since photons are usually described by their wavelength.
Momentum of a Graviton
Gravitons have been defined by the union of a photon and its associated anti-photon. This is written as Also, recall that the wavevector is defined from sums of quark coefficients, and that quarks are conserved. So the wavevector of a graviton is the sum of the wavevectors of its component photons. But the wavevector of any particle is symmetrically opposed to the wavevector of its matching anti-particle. Thus
Then, in a frame of reference noted by F, the momentum of a graviton is given by
where is the total number of quarks in including all types. This expression shows that all of the gravitons in a description have their momenta pointed in the same direction, and this direction is determined by attributes of the reference frame.
Consider a particle P that is described by its mass and momentum . And please notice that these numbers have been defined by a methodical description of sensation. The mechanical energy of P is defined by
The square root may be expanded in a binomial series as
And if we can ignore the smaller terms to approximate the mechanical energy with the expression
The requirement that is called a slow motion condition. An ethereal particle like a photon cannot move slowly because so the condition cannot be satisfied by any value of the momentum.
Thus in a perfectly inertial reference frame where gravitons carry no energy or momentum. If we assume that a frame is perfectly inertial, then we are also presuming that gravity can be ignored. For non-inertial frames, both the momentum and energy of a graviton are directly proportional to the total number of quarks it contains.
The Lorentz Factor
The mass and momentum may also be be combined to specify yet another quantity
This number is called the Lorentz factor after the Dutch physicist Hendrik Lorentz . His original work2H. A. Lorentz, The Theory of Electrons and its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat, page 225. Published by B. G. Teubner at Leipzig, 1909. expressed differently. But later, after discussing the speed of a particle, we will see that the forgoing definition is equivalent. In either case, the Lorentz factor of a moving particle is always greater than one.
We may use the Lorentz factor to classify particles. For example, when the slow motion condition applies, then But if then we say that a particle is relativistic. To make a useful approximation for the Lorentz factor we expand the square root into a binomial series as
Note that this is a little different from the previous series used for but terms still become progressively smaller. So if motion is not extremely relativistic, the Lorentz factor is taken as just the first two summands. Then we substitute these terms back into the foregoing expression for mechanical energy to obtain
Consider some laboratory experiments to measure and let us review some terms often used to compare these observations with theory. Let the experiment be accomplished by any combination of observation and inference whatsoever provided only that it satisfies the professional standards of experimental physicists.
For example this means that instruments are painstakingly calibrated. And any new measurement techniques are carefully compared with previous methods so that any systematic variations can be evaluated. Ideally experiments are repeated and confirmed by different scientists in other laboratories. So overall; measurement is a communal activity, with ancient roots, that links specific laboratory practice to the reproducible report of some number. The twentieth century has left us with an outstanding legacy of data about nuclear particles that come from measurements like this.
Any measurement of a particle presumably involves some sort of interaction that changes its quark content. The change may be small, maybe even negligible, but nonetheless there is always a logical distinction between an observed value and the theoretical concept of the energy of an isolated particle.
The customary way of assessing this is to make many observations, so consider a series of measurements with results noted by . These observed values are related to , the theoretical concept of mechanical energy, by
where is a typical or representative value called the experimental average. The other number describes the variation in observed values, it is called the experimental uncertainty. For good measurements is small enough so that and are interchangeable thus reconciling theory and observation. Usually the experimental average is determined from the arithmetic mean of the set of observations
and the experimental uncertainty is represented by their standard deviation
expressed on a logarithmic scale in units of decibels .
We characterize Newtonian particles as being in some kind of steady balance with their environment. They are presumably interacting with countless photons, bouncing around a lot, and colliding with other particles. But despite much agitation, there is still a central tendency that might loosely be called realistic motion, or perhaps naturalistic movement. Particles that depart too far from this balance may be called non-Newtonian, or even unphysical. To be more exact about this notion we define the kinetic and potential energy.
Since for material particles, is never negative. And in an inertial frame, momentum is proportional to the wavenumber So is proportional to . Then recall that the wavenumber mostly depends on dynamic quarks. So the kinetic energy depends strongly on P’s dynamic quark content. Dynamic quarks are objectified from somatic and visual sensations. So the kinetic energy depends strongly on these audio-visual sensations too.
Electromagnetic Potential Energy
Muonic Potential Energy
Electronic Potential Energy
Leptonic Potential Energy
Electromagnetic Potential Energy
Weak Potential Energy
Electroweak Potential Energy
Magnetoweak Potential Energy
Total Weak Potential Energy
Total Potential Energy of Centripetal Forces
Possible Definition of Potential Energy
Then the test definition implies that
Let us also include the mechanical energy in the description of P. The difference between and the kinetic energy defines another number called the potential energy
To evaluate , recall that if P is in slow motion, then
So the potential energy is approximated by . Thus for slowly moving Newtonian particles, the potential energy depends strongly on the mass. Then remember that for heavy particles, a sensory interpretation of the mass relates mainly to baryonic quarks and thermal sensations. And so for Newtonian particles, the potential energy is mostly associated with thermal sensations too.
What is Dynamic Equilibrium?
A particle is in dynamic equilibrium when its kinetic and potential energies are equal to each other. At equilibrium and there is an equal sharing, or equipartition, of mechanical energy between kinetic and potential types. But the potential energy is defined above by less . So for a particle in dynamic equilibrium
This account of dynamic equilibrium is succinct. And equipartition provides an important theoretical linkage to traditional notions of momentum. But it is not very helpful in the laboratory. Difficulties arise from using a hypothetical condition of perfect isolation to set the zero-value for energy measurements. Recall that our initial discussion of internal energy adopted the reference sensation of not seeing the Sun to grasp the notion of having no energy. So even in principle, we have no tangible reference standard for absolute-zero on the energy scale. And this is noticeable now that measurements can be made to a few parts in a trillion.
Moreover, there are conflicts with theories of dispersion and gravitation which may deny the possibility of perfect isolation. Anyway, these difficulties are manageable because physical phenomena often occur within distinct energy regimes which may have different ‘zeros’. In the laboratory we measure energy changes, that are related to each other by . Then a null-value standard for calibrated energy-difference measurements can be selected for experimental convenience. Results are reported using a slightly different version of the energy with a shifted origin
Then . These energy-differences are more susceptible of precise laboratory observation than absolute values. But and equipartition is inapt for shifted energies.
Sensory interpretation: As noted above, the kinetic energy characterizes visual stimuli, whereas the potential energy depends more on thermal perception. So there must be a balanced experience of both thermal and visual sensation for events to be objectified as particles in dynamic equilibrium. This requirement for eyes-open visual sensation means that, for example, a dream about flying while asleep cannot meet equilibrium conditions. And neither can watching cartoons on TV, because television only transmits audio-visual sensations, not thermal sensations. So dynamic equilibrium is more like experiencing ordinary daily circumstances in our classrooms and laboratories on Earth. Unlike many movies, dreams and hallucinations.
Newtonian particles are dense and heavy. And we regularly assume that they are in dynamic equilibrium with their surroundings. Then as discussed earlier, their enthalpy is related to their mass by the approximation
For particles in slow motion so that . But the absolute-value signs can usually be ignored because ordinary particles are composed from electrons, neutrons and protons which all have positive enthalpy. So if we exclude anti-particles and processes like annihilation, then we usually have
Thus the mechanical energy and the enthalpy are almost interchangeable for slow Newtonian particles made of ordinary matter. But enthalpy is conserved for all particles and conditions. So the energy and mass must also be approximately conserved for slow Newtonian particles too. This idea is honoured as an energy conservation law because it is so important for classical mechanics. Moreover, a conservation law for mass is a basic principle in benchtop chemistry. These excellent approximations are used everyday. Together with the routine assumption of dynamic equilibrium they typify Newtonian particles.
Consider some particle P characterized by its wavevector and the total number of quarks it contains Report on any changes relative to a frame of reference F which is characterized using the average wavevector of the quarks in F. The momentum of P in the F-frame is defined as
Let the frame of reference be formed from a large component and a smaller part that surrounds P so that
Let the large part of F be responsible for any gravitons that interact with P so that when gravitational effects are completely negligible Then P’s momentum is given by
From de Broglie’s postulate we have so
To simplify, set in the expression above to define as the wavelength of P in a non-dispersive surrounding medium
Many different combinations of photons and media are usefully characterized by defining the ratio
This number is called the index of refraction. Then in environments where there is no dispersion, and motion is described by
|1||Isaac Newton, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, page 639. Translated by A Motte and F Cajori. University of California Press, 1934.|
|2||H. A. Lorentz, The Theory of Electrons and its Applications to the Phenomena of Light and Radiant Heat, page 225. Published by B. G. Teubner at Leipzig, 1909.|